PALE MOON VS CHROME CODE

They even run their own independent sync server. Pale Moon forked years ago, and maintains a completely separate and independently developed codebase. Pale Moon is the only real fork here that doesn't rely on Mozilla releasing new versions of Firefox (Seamonkey doesn't really rely on it either, but it's barely being updated anyway). However, it's still completely reliant on Mozilla releasing new versions of Firefox, and it even uses Mozilla's sync server for sync. Waterfox Classic, on the other hand, is a bit more involved, in that it preserves the ability to use XUL extentions. Each new release of Firefox is given these modifications, and called Waterfox Current. Waterfox Current is a sort-of fork of Firefox, with a few modifications. Again, without Firefox, there is no Icecat. This of course makes it unofficial, which means it can't use the Firefox name. Richard Stalin doesn't like the way Mozilla compiles against non-free libraries, so Icecat is the Firefox codebase but compiled using libraries like LibreJS instead. Iceweasel isn't an alternative to Firefox, it is Firefox.

PALE MOON VS CHROME CODE

Debian devs tweaked the Firefox code to make it work properly/better on Debian, which means it's no longer an official release, which means it can't use the trademarked Mozilla/Firefox branding. Iceweasel is Firefox, with different branding. It's sync no longer works and it has very few available extensions. But it's basically on life support and get's virtually no development. Seamonkey/Mozilla Suite was great, and I continued to use it for years after Firefox and Thunderbird were forked from it. Click to expand.The problem is that almost none of those are real alternatives.

Pale moon vs chrome